Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] conductor photo***
From: george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 23:30:28 -0600
References: <17927424.1383758686696.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <5ECE5634-16D8-4F4C-8045-C6D3E533E9EB@icloud.com> <BF6F587D-5DB3-4033-9A96-463B83C71BB0@gmail.com> <24FB518C-CD65-4401-81F3-4FD9FA5DAD24@icloud.com> <75FCC7DD-2262-4C69-A5FB-B061E6F5727B@icloud.com> <527B1E88.7070606@jayburleson.com> <D44D4F79-8A8A-424E-8FCF-4B8980DF4054@icloud.com> <9024353A-9A7D-4EB1-9CBD-F21D3A368B29@gmail.com>
On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
> as they say in science, "garbage in ,garbage out...."
>
> my own limited experience using the NEX7 (a camera which I never liked at
> the outset) with leica lenses and manual focus has been
> positive......especially finding that I like the experience of easy and
> sure focus ( an experience which was always more sketchy with leica bodies
> with the exception of my M3's)
Never suggested that I'd seen any "science" re: A7 or A7R.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to:
Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] conductor photo***)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] conductor photo***)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] conductor photo***)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] conductor photo***)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] conductor photo***)
Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] conductor photo***)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] conductor photo***)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] conductor photo***)