Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What the hell is going on"
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 20:36:41 +0000
References: <3A1AF112-B333-457F-BA4D-E77DF3EE17EF@acm.org> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0F3789B@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <67E341E7-EC25-45A2-B60A-FD07A22091E9@acm.org>

You were shooting at 3200 not 32,000 ;-)

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Me or or the camera?
> 
> Herbert Kanner
> kanner at acm.org
> 650-326-8204
> 
> 
> On Jan 1, 2014, at 9:10 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> > Exaggerating by a factor of 10?
> >
> > john
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >> I have a Lumix DMC-LX5 that I bought from a LUG member. It's ISO goes
> >> up to an apparently ridiculous ISO 128,000. The picture I recently
> >> published (Cat
> >> Bed) was shot as ISO 32,000. It was noisy as hell and I had to apply
> >> much LR noise reduction to it.
> >>
> >> On New Year's Eve I took a bunch of shots in a dimly lit restaurant at
> 128,000.
> >> They showed absolutely no noise when viewed in LR at 1:1. When I
> >> discovered this, today, I took a set of test shots from ISO 8000
> >> through
> >> 128000 at the same aperture. The shutter speed doubled at each step
> >> as it is supposed to. Again, when I examined the shots, the noise
> >> peaked sharply at ISO 32000 an fell off at either side of it.
> >>
> >> I'm delighted to be able to shoot at 128000, but I ask: "What the
> >> hell is going
> >> on?)
> >>
> >> Herb
> >>
> >> Herbert Kanner
> >> kanner at acm.org
> >> 650-326-8204
> >>


In reply to: Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] What the hell is going on")
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] What the hell is going on")
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] What the hell is going on")