Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Yearbook Future
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 11:49:08 -0800
References: <e9f89bdb5aeb4f5b80cf8aff85c4b4a9@BLUPR05MB579.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <37f16a959321978c73f043a7a78d228d@mail.gmail.com>

I think your vision of the project, Jim, is the best one. Making it or part 
of it a contest limits it in a lot of ways. I'd rather try to find a way to 
get some of the (many) LUG members whom we might hear or read from 
occasionally or not, to start contributing.

If it had to come out as 2 - 300 page volumes a year, I would be delighted. 

I know that often, if I had stood at the same place at the same time that 
some photographer took a wonderful picture I love, I would not have taken 
that picture but some other ones. I delight in seeing those other visions.

So let's try and get more 'winners'!

Henning



On 2014-01-04, at 7:05 PM, Jim Shulman <jshulman at judgecrater.com> wrote:

> I'd considered a "best of year" photograph, and then thought the better of
> it for several reasons:
> 
> 1. It would hold up publication.  First you'd have to gather all the
> images, which again is no simple feat, then set them up for a vote (with a
> reasonable period of time, and uploaded in another medium, such as a web
> page or gallery).  We used to have judged LUG contests a few years ago,
> and if I remember correctly gathering the images and then arranging the
> judging wasn't exactly simple.
> 2. In order to judge the images, all the images would have to be made
> available for viewing.  Once you've seen all the images, the whole element
> of buying the book for discovery, surprise and delight dissipates (which
> is one reason that I never made more than the first fifteen pages
> available for viewing.)
> 3. One winner means there are 119 losers.  With no contest, there are 120
> winners.
> 
> Of course, it's now out of my hands for a successor, but these are my
> considerations.
> 
> All best,
> Jim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
> Of
> Duane Birkey
> Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:09 PM
> To: 'Lug
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Yearbook Future
> 
> I also agree that we should keep doing the LUG Yearbook....   and I would
> be willing to help edit/design/publish it...
> 
> 
> 
> I think we probably could do the project as a team effort and split up
> some of the responsibility as well.
> 
> 
> 
> One thing I would love to see would be for the LUG to select a "Best of
> the Year" photo from the group for the front and rear cover...
> Logistically, maybe a small group would pick out four or five of what they
> think are the best images...   and then have the LUG vote...   Anyhow, the
> top two images would get front and back cover...   And as an added bonus,
> winners would get to submit a third image for the inside of the book...
> Just an idea...
> 
> 
> 
> Duane
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


Henning Wulff
henningw at archiphoto.com






In reply to: Message from dbirkey at hcjb.org (Duane Birkey) ([Leica] Leica Yearbook Future)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Leica Yearbook Future)