Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Why not just grab an affordable Leica and shoot pictures? I did today--shot a roll of Neopan 400 with my M3/Summilux 50, which is drying now in the shower stall. If we had as many picture posts as we do discussions on Leica prices and market behavior, the LUG gallery would overload a server. Jim Shulman Wynnewood, PA Whose subjects show more spherical aberrations than his lenses. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 5:30 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas Exactly how I feel about it. As it happens to be true as the nose on your face. On 1/11/14 12:56 PM, "Paul Roark" <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote: > For business, it's really > a question of return on investment. In that respect, digital has > increased the cost of my "hobby," but it has lowered my "cost of > business" (due to huge productivity gains). > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information