Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sadly, I'd guess it was ever so, Geoff. I dare say direction (and manipulation) occurs more often in more intimate situations than larger gatherings. The one on one appeal "Ah g'wan, do this for the shot!" impacts more. Not for nothing do they say the first victim of war is the truth. Douglas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] The latest about Photo ethics in a war zone > So it is quite OK to artificially set up a shot by getting the combatant > to > pose dramatically at very close range right next to the media foxhole > equipped with video and stills equipment plus at least two journalists. > That is 'real' but cloning out the video equipment is not???? > > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 26 January 2014 03:53, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: > >> He should have used one of the new trees available in CC. Perhaps with >> Happy Vines? >> :-/ >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Greg Rubenstein <gcr910 at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > So much for photorealism -- even in a war zone. >> > >> > >> > >> http://photoblog.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/22/22406204-ap-severs-ties-with-pulitzer-winning-photographer-for-ethics-breach?lite >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Bob Adler >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >