Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:10:06 +0100
References: <BC511A43-E8FE-4E30-9A1B-B4A599FAC338@mac.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E6837C41@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CA+yJO1CCkhq4z1f8j0f6vbB+AqXM_2WVKKtv3_C8-DwMQZQYyg@mail.gmail.com>

+1x2

El 27/01/2014, a las 23:55, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> escribi?:

> +1!
> 
> Tina
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:37 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
> wrote:
> 
>> If you see the original, rather than a small jpeg, the tonality in the
>> Monochrom is much better than a converted M9 IMO
>> 
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>>> From these shots there seems to be no reason to prefer one over the
>> other, it is just an emotional preference.  Perhaps the M9 has a richer
>> black, but in Lightroom you could boost the black point of the MM image 
>> and
>> achieve the same result as the M9.  All of your images are very good.
>> 
>> If I had to choose I would think the M9 looked like Tri-X without the
>> grain, and the MM looked like TMax.
>> 
>> Tell us which you prefer, if you like one better that is.  Also, for the
>> M9 did you shoot in color and convert to B&W, or in jpg with the B&W
>> setting?
>> 
>> I prefer the M9, but that is probably because I already bought one.
>> 
>> Bob Rose
>> 
>> Message: 20
>> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:20:47 +0100
>> From: Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Message-ID: <5498B81A-FBC7-4DCC-805C-D7F940A2394B at gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>> 
>> The casta?uelas seller
>> 
>> Leica M9, Lux 75
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1038519.jpg.html
>>> 
>> 
>> the previous one posted with the MM was this one:
>> 
>> MM Lux 75
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1000827LR5w.jpg.html
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Young Couple
>> 
>> Leica M9, Lux 75
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1038523.jpg.html
>>> 
>> 
>> the previous one with the MM and Summilux 35
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1000863.jpg.html
>>> 
>> 
>> Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated
>> 
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley
> http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from robert.rose at mac.com (Robert Rose) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)