Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM
From: george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:54:05 -0600
References: <K9V61n00z0AFV7C019V7m7@mac.com> <52E71094.5080901@cox.net> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E683D31D@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <3941DB73-ED40-4DBC-AB4F-A065EA3E682E@gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E684A46B@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

On Jan 29, 2014, at 2:50 AM, John McMaster wrote:

> You are correct Lluis, over 16 years since I last developed a B&W film! 
> Zone system all the way, spotmeter, exposure tests for base density then 
> development tests for highlights all measured on a densitometer - how 
> quickly I forgot :-(
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> Are you sure of this? "expose for the highlights and develop for the 
> shadows just like film..", what I remember is expose for the shadows and 
> develop for the highlights., at least in the Ansel Adams book "The 
> Negative"...
> 
> Cheers
> Lluis

+1

'twas the chromes we needed to "expose for the highlights."
Remains the same for digital - blown highlights = unrecoverable.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



Replies: Reply from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)
In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)