Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:15:24 +0100
References: <CAH1UNJ3rpUAt8xxnMJdNGC9L_ncq8-ogF2Z1s_xSyqh9yHtR6Q@mail.gmail.com> <8602F760-A245-4586-831B-DCE9795E8CE1@frozenlight.eu> <2A7FCC55-4926-4EE5-A821-A38AC86F21E7@mac.com>

Sorry, I did not mean to offend anyone. I was just basing my comments on the 
dpreview writeup. Some of the negatives they listed (slowness etc.) would be 
a deal breaker for me. However, I should not have jumped to judgement, 
having no personal experience with the camera.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Feb 19, 2014, at 8:56 PM, Adam Bridge wrote:

> Well if it is a dog then it's a dog that can hunt, Nathan.
> 
> I've been using either the A7 or A7r for the past few months. They seem to 
> work very well. The Zeiss 55mm is perfect. I haven't tried the Sony 35mm 
> but my Leica 35mm f2 asph works just fine. I don't see the corner 
> "smearing" either, but I don't shoot photos of newspapers. In the real 
> world it's fine.
> 
> Where things get great is with longer lenses. The 100mm APO f2.8 R lens 
> does very well on this camera. I use a Novoflex adaptor for the R (and M) 
> lenses and they seem quite up to the job.
> 
> But I'm not a pixel-peeper kind of shooter. I got very good results with a 
> Leica 50mm f2.0 on my NEX-7 as anyone who has looked at the enlargement in 
> my living room can attest. The A7r is substantially better in terms of how 
> it handles and the images it makes.
> 
> I actually think it IS a breakthrough camera. EVF's wont' get worse. 
> They'll get a lot better. Sony will, I suspect, hear the critiques of the 
> current cameras and make better ones. I'll be able to buy those and STILL 
> not have spent what I would have to spend for an M. So, for me, for the 
> way I work, for the images I make, it's just fine.
> 
> It's not a rangefinder. It's not (gasp) a Leica. But it's a very good and 
> very useful camera for me.
> 
> Your mileage may vary.
> 
> Adam
> 
> On 2014 Feb 18, at 11:42 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Sounds like a dog, when reading the cons.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)