Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not much to see, but I was able to see it without clicking that... john ________________________________________ From: lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org [lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org] on behalf of Mark Rabiner [mark at rabinergroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2014 12:41 p.m. To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] DXOMark I'm not going to click a thing which says "25 days free trial" in order to see the thing. You almost always have a non easy disentanglement with those people. On 3/4/14 10:37 AM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote: > I agree. DXO has never liked anything Leica. I don't trust them at all. > > Tina > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:30 AM, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote: > >> dxo mark test criteria in general dont' like canon and leica stuff. when u >> look @ a camera, u need to look @ the system and dxo does not do that. i >> did get a s2 system and its quite nice. >> >> ------------------------------------- >> regards, mehrdad >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net >>> wrote: >> >>> Jayanand Govindaraj >>> >>>>>> >>> I know it is not everything, but this might be of some interest: >>> >>> >>> >> http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Leica-S-sensor-review-Consummate-performer/Lei >> ca-S-vs-Phase-One-IQ180-Digital-Back-vs-Pentax-645D >>> <<< >>> >>> Some discussion of the DxO numbers here: >>> >>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=87679.0 >>> >>> Doug Herr >>> Birdman of Sacramento >>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com >>>