Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like to use capture sharpening for every file on import and may use localised sharpening in developing or not. The effect of capture sharpening is very much controlled by the settings, especially masking. Sharpening for output ought to be dependent on what you are outputting (for prints or low resolution web images for examples). Within that regime I will vary according to the media for printing too. These are all tools to contribute to the best possible results. Certainly you may not see any significant changes with web images. Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 20 March 2014 11:24, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > There has been a bit on Iridient on getdpi (Fuji section, > http://www.getdpi.com/forum/fuji/50182-fuji-x-t1-greens-jpg-files-help-please.html) > , why do you think the M240 needs more sharpening? Real question as my > Leica stuff gets minimal post-prod compared to what other marque users seem > to do... > > john > ________________________________________ > > Though the link below talks about sharpening in Lightroom (RAW pre > sharpening) and Photoshop for the Fuji X-Trans sensor, I believe the author > states it appears to work well for all sensors without an AA filter (M240 > falls into that category). > Definitely worth a read and, perhaps, downloading the LR and PS > presets/actions. > http://blog.thomasfitzgeraldphotography.com/category/x-trans-processing/ > If you do try them out, please share you findings esp. relative to the > M240. > Best, > Bob > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >