Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Oh now Dr Ted, with greatest respect it does make a big difference if you are working with wides and colour. I agree that for BW and for lens 50 and 90 such as you were working with it makes no technical difference at all to the quality. As always of course, content is king and your work is an absolute inspiration. Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 30 March 2014 15:48, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote: > UNFORTUNATELY " you shouldn't have wasted your money having it done in the > first place!" None of my M lenses are coded and it makes absolutely no > difference in the quality of the photo moments I catch! > > Cheers, > Dr. ted :-) > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Endress" <rendress at mac.com> > To: <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 2:03 PM > Subject: [Leica] Inconsistent lens detection on M 8 > > > > Hello all, >> >> I am just getting around to coding my lenses. I am getting inconsistent >> results. My 28mm f2.8 and 50mm f2.8 show up fine but my 50mm f2 and >> Voigtlander 50mm f1.5 and 12mm f5.6 are not detected. A Voigtlander 35mm >> f1.7 was not detected on the first shot but detected on the second. Any >> ideas why the inconsistency? richard >> >> >> >> Richard Endress >> rendress at me.com >> >> http://questingbeast.zenfolio.com >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/grabshooter/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >