Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica R system
From: piers.hemy at gmail.com (piers@hemy.org)
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 23:45:05 +0100
References: <8D120A5EB9B1951-16A0-36333@webmail-d146.sysops.aol.com> <EE1406DB-B1D9-4CE4-9DCB-6D9CA04B09B1@frozenlight.eu>

Umm, I disagree. The rankings surely are worth plenty to those schools with
the highest rankings, and of course to their alumni/alumnae. And the top 30
in the FT rankings (Darden) is not to be sniffed at.

The report itself? Shallow, no doubt, but written for an audience which is
clearly not LUG. But case study material? Things must have dumbed down very
considerably since I laboured over 'Boston Weather Bureau'!

Piers - alma mater undisclosed.

On 7 Apr 2014 19:30, "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
>
> The various rankings are worth very little. From a global perspective,
Yale, Harvard, Kellogg etc. are much stronger brands than Virginia. But my
comment was as much aimed at business schools in general. Most of them just
teach the latest fads.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan (MBA 1993 from Temple University)
>


In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] Leica R system)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Leica R system)