Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:52:39 +1000
References: <37877B71-8223-4F5E-975D-816FAFBF28CA@bex.net>

Howard yes no maybe depends and yes you have too much time on your hands ;-)

This might be of interest 100% (pixel for pixel on your screen) crop
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/155191481


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 12 April 2014 14:14, Howard Ritter <hlritter at bex.net> wrote:

> As my work schedule slows down towards retirement, I seem to have way too
> much time on my hands. So I decided to pursue a question I've been
> wondering about for a long time. I got out some cameras and lenses and a
> couple rolls of film and shot some photos of the house across the pond,
> scanned the film, and cropped down to the small central portion of the
> images to compare. I'd read that the best general-pupose emulsions resolve
> as high as 150 line pairs/mm, which corresponds to 300 pixels/mm, or 7200 x
> 10800 pixels in a FF sensor. That's around 80 Mpx, which is also in the
> same range for estimates of the information content that I've seen quoted
> for 35mm film. This led me to expect that digital would fall short of film,
> which puzzled me a bit as I have been not at all impressed by the technical
> performance of the slides and negs I've been scanning.
>
> I picked Fujicolor 200 and Tri-X to compare with the D800, M typ 240, M8,
> and NEX-7, 35mm lenses for the FF cameras, and 24mm for the M8 and NEX-7. I
> also shot the same scene with both the M8 and NEX-7 at 35mm so I could
> compare performance at the same image scale on the sensor.
>
> Suffice it to say that I was surprised by the results, linked below. Sure
> wish I could try Panatomic-X!
>
>  http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hlritter/Res+Test+Crops/
>
> I was also surprised to discover that even the highest pixel-count FF
> sensor yet available does not match the capabilities of the lenses we use.
> I've posted to that effect before, but here are the images to illustrate
> the point.
>
> Comments and corrections of my misconceptions invited & appreciated.
>
> --howard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)
In reply to: Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)