Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica T
From: leicaphong at gmail.com (LeicaPhong)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:02:38 -0400
References: <6719076.1398394428055.JavaMail.root@elwamui-lapwing.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <4AF8961A-61E3-4E08-AB4B-FEC5FCDF8FE6@archiphoto.com> <CACeROa6BVeEOyyqN6dAB+-hnx3vvfXo0RF5cgS9Qqk3kcQtGoQ@mail.gmail.com> <7CFE562E-5D4A-49A7-A0AF-CFEE63434A31@archiphoto.com>

Of course !  Not sure what was I thinking.
Thanks.

Phong

On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com> 
wrote:

> No, a shorter register and wider mount both make designing lenses easier 
> and possibly less expensive. Large rear elements help with wideangles; 
> especially fast wideangles. Designs can be closer to telecentric, so that 
> the rays hitting the sensors in the corners can be closer to perpendicular 
> to the sensor plan.
> 
> Henning
> 
> 
> 
> On 2014-04-25, at 8:50 AM, Phong <leicaphong at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Henning,
>> 
>>>> Only if you have a shorter register and a wider mount, optical
>> possibilities are increased.
>> 
>> Would a shorter register impose more challenges to the design of 
>> wide-angle
>> lenses, given the smaller angle of incidence to the edges and corners of
>> the image circle ?
>> 
>> - Phong
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
>> archiphoto.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> No, and the digital M's all have a bit of that already. Only if you have 
>>> a
>>> shorter register and a wider mount, optical possibilities are increased,
>>> body plus lens thickness can be decreased and you can make a digital body
>>> that can use manual and autofocus lenses equally well. Or you could have 
>>> a
>>> body designed primarily for autofocus use, and you could have a body
>>> designed for optical rangefinder use and they could use the same lenses.
>>> Aperture control could be on the body, or the lenses for full frame use.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2014-04-24, at 7:53 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Henning Wulff wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> Yes, Leica has had a few areas to struggle over in becoming a digital
>>> camera manufacturer. One of them was the thickness of the camera. I think
>>> most film M camera users would like a digital M the thickness of an M4, 
>>> but
>>> that won't happen with the sensor, filter pack and display screen adding 
>>> to
>>> the thickness.
>>>> <<<
>>>> 
>>>> Is there anything wrong with a digital body the same thickness as the M4
>>> with the lens mount protruding to provide the mount register distance?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> Henning Wulff
> henningw at archiphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Leica T)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Leica T)
Message from leicaphong at gmail.com (Phong) ([Leica] Leica T)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Leica T)