Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/05/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Mark, Richard, Ken. If I decide to do B&W film more, I will certainly develop my own film. The tanks and such are still in my garage. And I did quite a lot of scanning before I went digital. The way I scan, I do my best to get the entire range of the negative into a 16-bit TIFF, perhaps minus the specular highlights. Then I mess with curves, spotting, local contrast, and "dodging and burning" in Picture Window Pro. I might want to fool around with the files in Capture One if that's possible, I haven't checked yet. Since the "Nurse" photo, I've worked up this one from the same roll. I like it. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/14085787215/> --Peter I wrote, and several others responded thereto: > I've embarked on an experiment to see whether I want to shoot B&W film > again. The "Nurse" picture I recently posted was the beginning of that > experiment. > <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/13892553280/> > > Here are a few things I've noticed while "recalibrating" > myself--otherwise known as "how the heck did I do this back in '06?" > > Here's a side by side of the same Tri-X shot, scanned at 4000 dpi (left) > and 2000 dpi (right). The negative was developed in Xtol 1:2 by > Moonphoto, a good B&W lab a few miles from my home. The scanner is a > Canon FS-4000, running under VueScan. Click the double rectangle above > the picture to see it full size. > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/GrainAliasTriX4Kvs2Kdpi.JPG.html>