Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/05/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: New studio portrait
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 10:16:18 +1000
References: <CAE3QcF6rZdDQcR_aUPWYutyQE8aU+b8CPaq1+JGnw03jC+SfEw@mail.gmail.com> <44D23F095BC640F2BD12AC4789F45B2B@syneticfeba505>

Ted thank you very much for taking time to comment and encourage me. I will
show you some amazing faces from this model. She is a real character and we
get on and work together really well.


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 10 May 2014 07:29, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Geoff Hopkinson SHOWED:
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: New studio portrait
>
>
>  http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/155544337
>>
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> I realize in some aspects of fashion the model need not look like a female
> in "heat?" And they do so in much of the hundreds of fashion related images
> we see today in almost every magazine, newspaper, whatever. On a general
> shoot as you have presented , yours' are smashing in the fashion of
> fashion's of the day. Love them as your abilities have improved immensely
> since you began our "learning of how to's."
>
> Now this one? If we in the general sense see 99.9 % of your images as
> "scantily dressed models?" Me? Love it! ;-)
>
> However? Some of the lads can't see beauty for all the revealing
> nakedness? .............. "THEIR LOSS!" ;-) If I read their comments and
> objectives correctly? The good ladies should have more clothing allowing
> the "YOUNG LADS?" to use their wild wild and crazy boyhood imagination to
> revel within their fun imaginations of their youth! ;-) ;-)
>
> And have the imagenary option or maynot of what hides beneath more
> clothing? Than letting the nakedness sit out there in all it's clean & open
> beauty.
>
> Now back to today's model in blank dead pan facial figure? Right off? Not
> my kind of what usually is considered a "model beauty." Although I bet she
> has a beautiful smile when she does! An almost scary expression that the
> wrong comment may well cost you every tiny bit of skin on your body in the
> blink of an eye! SCARY!
>
> Now? If that was the point of this image? "Killer girl?" Man I don't think
> it could've been shot by anyone? Better than what you've captured what the
> expression illustrates.
>
> Everyone should consider what we see here almost daily, are images being
> shot for the "How to be a fashion model photographer!!" And some of the
> crew playing with the jolly good fun of learning how to be a fashion
> photographer.
>
> In the "REALITIES OF THESE DAYS? THE GUYS AND GALS WHO ARE STILL MAKING
> SUPER MAGICAL SALARIES ARE THOSE WORKING WITH BEAUTIFUL FORMS OF HUMANS
> DAILY." Fashion models! Clothed or not!
>
> WHILE US?  not worth mentioning! :-(
>
> Bring them on Geoff, "WHY?" Because those who wish to learn more about
> shooting other subjects? Whatever they maybe? Are cool with your almost
> daily model "How to's naked or nearly so! Thanks a bunch old buddy.
> cheers,
> Dr. ted. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] IMG: New studio portrait)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: New studio portrait)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] IMG: New studio portrait)