Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Two back-to-back musings on this very subject: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2014/05/the-recto-stamp.html http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2014/05/and-the-winner-ismore-about-pens.html My opinion is that signing my prints makes me feel that the print is truly completed, regardless of whether it sits in the files or on my (or anothers) wall. Jay On 5/17/2014 5:12 PM, Adam Bridge wrote: > What?s the current thought on signing prints? > > I?ve done a substantial amount of printing for my home. None of the images > are signed on the front but they are on the back. People ask why I didn?t > sign them. Because I know who took them! > > It?s not like I?m leaping into the market for prints, but I?m curious > about the thought on this. > > On the back of prints I put the name of the file, the printer that created > the image, the date of the original exposure and the date of printing. > > I?m curious. And bored. :-) > > Adam