Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/06/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMGs: Oklahoma City
From: george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:50:00 -0500
References: <CAJ4y7gxn0SjdAM7F+u0DQyjkRdQp1=S55jZnEFqbZ50j_h7N=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ26E2u1Rc92Gze9hg_tFw5nCPq0DoqMo3F+8m7a6VKXwQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4y7gwkkB54b8CKjd_hfmTZK-vuCVpyFgcS8j+yD8HsUbGp_g@mail.gmail.com> <49A4E14A-2797-4BA9-B222-963FB6765822@sfr.fr>
 
On Jun 30, 2014, at 10:12 AM, philippe.amard wrote:

> I wouldn't, it is what gives the whole photo its third plane and attracts 
> me.
> 
> I'd simply go for a crop so that the lighter part distracting the eye has 
> gone.
> Sample here with some extra philiprocessing involved ;-)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Bob+tower+and+lamp+post-.jpg.html
> 
> Hope this helps

I agree.

whenever possible
entertain the use of foreground, middle ground, background.

this rule needs to be broken
though only when absolutely appropriate

(or so I recommended to my students.
oh how I miss those young minds)

Regards,
George Lottermoser 

http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] IMGs: Oklahoma City)
 In reply to: Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] IMGs: Oklahoma City)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] IMGs: Oklahoma City)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] IMGs: Oklahoma City)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMGs: Oklahoma City)