Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] More on film
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:35:50 -0700
References: <55058A54-00E3-4F80-811E-700FB92A0EC2@gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ2dRas_OBCODKPtUgsFMNX8Xdb73TR=iai=Qam_8D86YQ@mail.gmail.com> <4B849B67-1C9B-4BE3-960A-45C6CAFF0F30@gmail.com> <53B27AC6.70906@summaventures.com> <53B4A35C.3010600@cox.net> <53B4B082.5010401@cox.net> <BE3C7F3D-65EE-4DCF-8D47-E42748833C7D@gmail.com>

Lluis, It's super easy to develop your own B&W. Many tutorials on the web
and you can email me if you like.


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Lluis Ripoll <
lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ken,
>
> Thank you very much again. Today I've found another professional lab and
> they can develop my films with the developer of my choice X-TOL, HC 110, D
> 76, D 23 .... they do the work manually and I want try, you will know my
> experience.
>
> Cheers
> Lluis
>
>
> El 03/07/2014, a las 03:23, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> escribi?:
>
> > Lluis,
> >
> > Good luck, your images deserve the best.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > On 7/2/2014 7:42 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
> >> Ken,
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for very kind comment.
> >>
> >> It was a while I was not shooting film, I was very happy with the
> developing quality of this Lab, they was using X-Tol, I didn't know that
> they have changed... and now I think they have ruined these negatives..., I
> will take a look to another very reputed Lab and if I'm not sure I will
> follow your advice.
> >>
> >> Thank you very much again!
> >>
> >> Cheers!
> >> Lluis
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El 03/07/2014, a las 02:27, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> escribi?:
> >>
> >>> Lluis,
> >>>
> >>> Just me, but if I had a talent like yours I would never let anyone
> develop my film.  Every time I have had a lab develop silver film it has
> been a mistake (OK, I don't have HCB's assistants handy).  C41 and E6, yes,
> b&w, no.  I had problems with water quality also. But, we were lucky to
> have a plant here bottling "mineral" water (Ozarka brand).  They brought
> water up from their well, distilled it, and then added always the same
> amount of minerals.  I used that for developing, filtered tap water for the
> rest and distilled with Photo Flo for final.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Ken
> >>>
> >>> On 7/2/2014 6:52 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
> >>>> Peter,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've just said to Jayanand that today I've asked my Lab if they did
> some changes in the developing, and yes! this explain why I was unhappy
> with the quality of my last negatives.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your comment
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Lluis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> El 01/07/2014, a las 11:09, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com>
> escribi?:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Lluis,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The point that I was making in the post that I put up a few minutes
> ago is that
> >>>>> I would have expected the film to give better results than digital
> in your
> >>>>> hands. Your film shots generally have greater depth than these ones.
> I think
> >>>>> that it must be the Plustek as the M3 and Summicron on TX should
> produce what
> >>>>> most of us would regard as "your style".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Saludos,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Peter
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 24/06/2014 15:04, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
> >>>>>> Thank you Jayanand, I find very interesting your comment. Do you
> mean that my film shots are too smooth?.  This is an interesting
> observation, I generally like better the B&W from film just for that
> reason, more large and smooth tonalities, I also see a difference, even a
> big difference between my scans from my old shots developed by my self and
> the actual ones, more "neutral" and smooth and not developed by me. The
> fact is that I don't want develop any more myself, the water quality has
> changed a lot and there are many spots on my home developed films,
> distilled water can be the right way maybe.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I will appreciate your further comments on this, I'm interested to
> hear your opinion, thank you again
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>> Lluis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> El 24/06/2014, a las 04:47, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at 
> >>>>>> gmail.com>
> escribi?:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rita Rouge, without a doubt, out of these three. I prefer your
> digital
> >>>>>>> offerings, at least for online viewing, they tend to have much
> better
> >>>>>>> tonal depth.
> >>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>> Jayanand
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Lluis Ripoll
> >>>>>>> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Concert
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/lluisripoll/14489019812/>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Leica M3, Elmarit 21, Tri X 400, plustek
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Rita Rouge
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/lluisripoll/14510359703/>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Leica M3, Summicron Collapsible, Tri X 400, Plustek
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Happy
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/lluisripoll/14303792737/>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Leica M3, Summicron Collapsible, Tri X 400, Plustek
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c are always appreciated
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Saludos cordiales
> >>>>>>>> Lluis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ===========================================================
> >>>>> Dr Peter Dzwig
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto


Replies: Reply from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] More on film)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] More on film)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] More on film)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] More on film)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] More on film)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] More on film)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] More on film)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] More on film)