Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/07/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] NZ PAW 28
From: leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson)
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 20:35:06 -0700
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9F84E4CC6@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAE3QcF6QYjzaMfB1=nPwLzSbjGceebUd4w_LDJ42c3BrmwRJqQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9F84E5D04@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAE3QcF7zLeXnuqLy5hHpka+paJ-2Q3EvBh32Oc7o_puPLx1WWg@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9F84E5DD7@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>
 
Yep, looks pretty bad.
Better send it to me & I can compare it to mine... ;-)

Ain't it a sweet lens?

Jay

On 7/11/2014 4:26 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> If you look at 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Chiaroscuro/Misc/50AA_crop.jpg.html large 
> you can see a 100% crop of shot 15 taken at f2.0....is that defective ;-)
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Yes I know ;-) Please send me that defective lens and I will try to nurse
> it back to health ;-)
>
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
> On 12 July 2014 09:18, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Geoff, actually #1 was taken with an APO lens ;-) Overexposed, once
>> I shot at 'proper' exposure it was perfect - have to find the 
>> boundaries....
>>
>> john
Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 28)
 In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 28)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] NZ PAW 28)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 28)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] NZ PAW 28)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 28)