Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/07/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Stand-Alone Photo Processing Software - Chris Crawford
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:06:15 -0400

I use Bridge. It can be slow but I'm totally used to it.


On 7/13/14 10:52 AM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote:

> I used Media Pro from the time it used to be iView.  The advantage is that
> you can search through all catalogs and you can have several catalogs open
> at the same time.  The disadvantage is that they are very slow to upgrade
> to new formats and it doesn't play well with DNG files.  Mine is also slow
> and crashes often. I have almost abandoned it in favor of LR which is much
> faster but can only open one catalog at a time.  You can get around that by
> only having one catalog ;-)
> 
> Tina
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at icloud.com> wrote:
> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> Thanks for the timely reminder about Media Pro. I have been wanting to
>> link a database with Capture One Pro and had completely forgotten its
>> sister program (duh!). I have downloaded a trail and will give it a go.
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> 
>> Gerry
>> 
>> Gerry Walden
>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
>> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>> www.gwpics.com
>> 
>> On 13 Jul 2014, at 11:08, Chris Crawford <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Mark,
>>> 
>>> Many of us use both Lightroom and Photoshop. I use Photoshop alone for
>>> editing my film scans, but for processing RAW files from my digital
>>> cameras, Lightroom makes it easier to go through the photos from a shoot,
>>> pick the ones to edit, and do basic editing (white balance, lens
>>> distortion corrections, etc.) quickly. Photoshop is really best for
>>> editing single images, not for working with larger numbers. Most photos I
>>> do require some more in-depth work, dodging and burning and such, which I
>>> think Photoshop's layers and masking abilities are better at than
>>> Lightroom.
>>> 
>>> I don't use LR for cataloging, I find it slow and cumbersome for that,
>> and
>>> I'd have to put my film scans in it. I use Microsoft Expression Media for
>>> that. Phase One bought the software from Microsoft a few yrs back, and
>>> they sell it as Phase One Media Pro (It was originally called iView Media
>>> Pro before Microsoft bought iView, then MS decided they didn't want it
>>> after all, and sold it to Phase One). Of all the cataloging databases for
>>> photos that are available for Macs, I think iView/Expression Media/P1
>>> Media Pro is the best.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Chris Crawford
>>> Fine Art Photography
>>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>>> 260-437-8990
>>> 
>>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
>>> 
>>> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
>>> Become a fan on Facebook
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7/13/14 5:12 AM, "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I should not claim to know what software exactly medium format shooters
>>>> use.
>>>> I just know they have reason to use software other than Photoshop. Often
>>>> software involved with the tethering process. Having their stuff live
>> on a
>>>> big screen as they are shooting it being looked at and rated by art
>>>> directors. And other parameters having to do with medium format shooting
>>>> which I know little about never having done it and I'm told Photoshop
>>>> doesn't have. I'm led to believe that all the top work in medium format
>> is
>>>> done with specialized software. I'm also aware that a lot of work now
>> done
>>>> by respected people is with Lightroom.  But they tend to be younger
>>>> shooters
>>>> not having decades of experience with Photoshop. I just don't think
>> people
>>>> who have mastered Photoshop over decades are going to give it up for
>>>> Lightroom. They'd be saying goodbye to who knows what and who knows when
>>>> you're going to need it.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 7/13/14 3:36 AM, "Gerry Walden" <gwpics at icloud.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Mark
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am intrigued why you would restrict Capture One to medium format and
>>>>> Photoshop for anything else (i.e. not medium format). To my mind both
>>>>> would
>>>>> seem to handle all formats equally well. If shooting with a Phase one
>>>>> camera
>>>>> then there would be some logic to your argument.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gerry
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gerry Walden
>>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
>>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>>>>> www.gwpics.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 13 Jul 2014, at 00:22, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you were shooting medium format you'd use Phase One Capture one
>>>>>> Software.
>>>>>> If you were doing anything else you'd use Photoshop
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>> Photographer
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> 




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Stand-Alone Photo Processing Software - Chris Crawford)