Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] was Mamiya 6 now Square
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:59:46 +0100
References: <CFF254F0.223AE%mark@rabinergroup.com>

They did make 24x24 and you can get a Zeiss Ikon Tenax II on eBay right now, 
but it only has the 2.8 Tessar and not the 2.0 Sonnar. It's hip to be 
square....

Douglas

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Mamiya 6


> If they made a 24x24mm format 35mm camera who knows how much more film 
> would
> have been shot?
> Why not make a square format digital camera? Or one with that format in 
> the
> options? I'd buy one!
> Its great to never have to turn your camera on its side.
>
>
> On 7/21/14 5:17 AM, "Chris Crawford" <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Richard. I am still shooting the Mamiya 6! I used it with the 
>> 50mm
>> lens and Ilford Delta 3200 film at EI-1600 for this photo. That let me
>> handhold the shot; it was early evening and this is in the shade because
>> of the trees. The exposure was 1/30 at f11.
>>
>> The Mamiya 6 is wonderful. I have always loved 6x6; the square format
>> works for my work well (though I did crop this photo a bit on the sides),
>> but other 6x6 cameras I have used were not really handholdable. I had a
>> Mamiya C330f when I was younger, and shot my art school graduation 
>> project
>> on it:
>>
>> http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/chris-results.php?category=60
>>
>> Loved the image quality, and the fact that the camera and lenses were
>> inexpensive, but it was too heavy for me to hold, and using it on a 
>> tripod
>> was a pain because of the waist level finder (I know they made a prism,
>> but I didn't have one...was a poor student then). I had to sell it after
>> college because I needed money. Later, I was able to get a Hasselblad.
>> Same problems, except I did have a prism for it, but the lenses were very
>> heavy. Sold it and got the Mamiya 6 a year and a half ago.
>>
>> Wish I'd just begun with the Mamiya 6, it is perfect. I had not shot a
>> single frame of 35mm film since getting it, until last week when I shot a
>> roll to use for a developing demonstration for someone who paid me to
>> teach her to develop film. The student (who is actually a high school art
>> teacher) shoots only 35, so I used it for my lesson.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] was Mamiya 6 now Square)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Mamiya 6)