Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Aug 21, 2014, at 7:07 PM, Doug Herr wrote: > Ted Grant wrote: > >> Alan Magayne-Roshak OFFERED: >> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh >> >> Here is my candidate for an example of pleasing bokeh. It's my 85mm f/2 >> Nikkor LTM at /2.8: >> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Enigmatic/Fowl_AMR.jpg >> .html><<<<<<< >> >> Hi Alan, >> Interesting you point this out. Thank you. >> As the background to me as I first looked at the photo was meaningless! My >> eyes, well the one good one went right to the birds without any re-action >> to >> the back ground. > > That's the entire point of pleasing bokeh. The background doesn't > distract from the subject. With ugly bokeh the background competes for > attention with the subject. If we consider photography a form of "visual art" Then, obviously, how the photograph "looks" matters. The photographer, theoretically, controls that "look" by controlling many variables including choice of lens based on the visual qualities of the given lens. Content is important - of course. Visual qualities are also important. Some may consider content the MOST important. Some may consider the visual qualities MOST important. I'd go with finding the magic balance of both content and visual qualities to cause the viewer to appreciate, and learn from the art object. Regards, George Lottermoser http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist