Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank for your comment, I?ll revisit the picture. Cheers Lluis El 13/09/2014, a las 00:04, George Lottermoser <george.imagist at icloud.com> escribi?: > > On Sep 7, 2014, at 1:16 AM, Ted Grant wrote: > >> Hi Nathan, >> Sorry mate I hate to disagree with you on this one. The foreground water >> with only parts of the two buildings appearing are a complete distraction >> from the boy alone and jumping. And full buildings standing in the >> background. It might be different if the boy were also reflected in the >> water????????????? Maybe? >> >> The water and building reflections are a definite distraction! The three >> points that really make the photo work are.......... Boy and two buildings >> clean without water and reflections. >> >> I made a couple of prints and the water reflections destroy the image of >> the >> "THREE POINTS OF COMPOSITION" BOY AND TWO BUILDING POINTS! I find the fore >> ground reflections quite a distraction, rather than adding anything to an >> other wise interesting well balanced photograph. Once again........... ON >> THE "THREE COMPOSIIONAL POINTS" >> >> Your thoughts good Sir? > > I think you can lose the buildings in the top half of the frame > and get to the heart of the matter > > the boy between two bodies of water. > > the buildings over power the action > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information