Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The first one is better for me - the OoF area looks artificial in the second one, and the composition is "weaker", read less strong. Well, that's all because I saw #1 first probably, I would have been pleased to produce #2 in any case. Amities Philippe Le 16 sept. 14 ? 19:19, George Lottermoser a ?crit : > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Montie wrote: > >> I like! Would like better with slightly deeper >> focus depth. (front/top third from right lantern, >> less blur right foreground). Did you shoot others >> at different stops/distances? >> >> Montie >> >>>> c & c always welcome and appreciated >> >> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=9249> > > have another look if you please Montie > > I've added another view > after the original > > I look forward to your opinion > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince. NO ARCHIVE