Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film
From: j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:21:22 +0200
References: <32402C5B-142A-4463-A735-253A4CBFC4A4@gmail.com>, <54320788.7070104@jayburleson.com>, <F1CDA2AC-4472-4868-8BEF-055722AFB554@gmail.com>

Bonjour Luis,
Je ne vois pas de diff?rence entre les deux, le MM semble produire des 
images un peu plus piqu?es, mais cela n'a rien ? voir avec le mat?riel dans 
ton cas. J'aime ?videmment beaucoup ces images, c'est du N&B, du "vrai", les 
noirs sont noirs et les blancs sont blancs! La seule diff?rence pour toi est 
la facilit? avec laquelle tu peux traiter les fichiers num?riques. Question: 
tu d?veloppes les films toi-m?me? Et tu as un scanner personnel (Plustek)?  
JM


Jean-Michel Mertz
Strasbourg

 
> From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 15:20:58 +0200
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film
> 
> Thank you Jay! I agree with you and I still have to learn to improve some 
> aspects, on other aspects, the same comment I?ve just sent to John ?... 
> the highlights sow better with film, even the contrasts are a little 
> better with film I think, but as you say, these points can be solved or 
> improved with exposure and process.?
> 
> Cheers
> Lluis
> 
> El 06/10/2014, a las 05:07, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com> 
> escribi?:
> 
> > Lluis,
> > One of the things about the MM is that if one has a properly exposed 
> > image, then it exhibits the long, smooth tonal scale and other 
> > characteristics of film, minus the grain.
> > 
> > Just what your comparison shows, and you don't have to get your hands 
> > wet with chemicals!
> > 
> > Jay
> > 
> > On 10/5/2014 6:25 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
> >> I have scanned two film backlights from the year 2007 with Kodak Plus 
> >> X, Leica MP, lens ignored. Plustek scanner and Vuescan :
> >> 
> >> Carrer del Correu Vell
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031228LR5BN.jpg.html>
> >> 
> >> The Light Way
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031216LR5BN.jpg.html>
> >> 
> >> Please compare to the Leica Monochrom with Tri Elmar recently posted:
> >> 
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141003_L1001068__MMLR5BN.jpg.html>
> >> 
> >> All these pictures have a slightly touch of Silver Efex Pro, same 
> >> toning applied to all.
> >> 
> >> In my opinion I can?t say any better quality on film vs MM, except the 
> >> grain of course, I?ve don?t put it on the MM version, I consider it is 
> >> artificial. What do you think?
> >> 
> >> Thanks for looking, your c&c are greatly appreciated
> >> 
> >> Saludos cordiales
> >> Lluis
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
                                          


Replies: Reply from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)
Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)