Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Its basically a troll. Its pretty obvious people on a Leica named User list are going to have a clue as to what a premium product is and what that can do for your work. Other options come with a many work arounds. And are basically here today gone tomorrow deals. They are not premium products which are going to be used by many for serious work. A statement that the M 250 is an outdated outmoded camera is certainly a way out rationalization for buying a mirrorless camera. Stating it's a Leica is a smug troll. Basically flipping off Leicas and Leica use. I think your new Sony Mirrorless is a new Sony Mirrorless. Its a far cry from a Leica M on a slew of levels. I belive the M's coming out now are a complete and most excellent realization of digital for Leica. With no apologies needed. No caveats No problems other than high cost.. For sure worth the money if the money can be obtained. On 11/2/14 12:21 PM, "George Lottermoser" <george.imagist at icloud.com> wrote: > absolutely not Sonny. The whole "my next Leica will be a 'not leica'" is so > far removed from lofty 'visions' that any and all silly subjects will > certainly work? my next Leica camera will be a Bolex? my next Leica lens > will > be a 300 mm Super Symmar? which I'll mount on my next Leica camera? which > will > be Phase One ;~) a note off the iPad, George On Nov 2, 2014, at 10:43 AM, > Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, I'm living with a two year > old for the week, do you expect lofty > visions all the time? > ;-) _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See > http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/