Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Ted! Your comments are always greatly appreciated. Tina Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 4, 2014, at 6:33 PM, "Ted Grant" <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote: > > Tina SHOWED: > Subject: [Leica] IMG: The Knitter, II >> Here is a closer one of the elderly knitter: > http://www.pbase.com/image/158445342 > > "I like his eyes and hands, but his whole hat is not in this one.""""" > > Hi Tina, > 'STRONG & POWERFUL right in yer face!" LOVE IT.:-0 > > So we don't see the complete hat? BIG DEAL! The face and look is so very > strong the missing part of the hat isn't relevant! > Besides it's so simple to address anyone having a negative remark about the > hat not being there etc etec etec. > > 1/ If we never saw the "face with hat" no one would have a problem seeing > the image full face and hat crop. > ERGO: no problem whatsoever! Yes some are going to come back with "I like > the full face and complete hat is the best!! > > ME? Who cares as they're both equally strong powerful photos, but wouldn't > likely be used side by each as we were shown here. Try being a photo editor > and doing a page layout with photos fitting a story? > > No opinion problems with me as they're equally strong and would be used in > various manners. So in that case we as viewers would be just as much in awe > seeing each on different days in different magazine articles. > > One story might be about the hat! ERGO: full hat photo used! Obviously. > The other story about hands? Whatever? > Sure fine to have a like == dislike opinion. And rightly so when they're > sitting side by each. > > In any event Tina my dear lady. You just blew everyone away one more time > once again! :-) > > cheers, > Dr. ted :-) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information