Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] For trade? Or, maybe I'm just way off base.
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:29:22 +0100
References: <FDA24E92-4FDA-43D4-99A2-742713D99847@icloud.com>

Susan,

In my opinion if you like B&W and if your work is mainly in B&W, you will no 
regret go for the MM, I still keep the M9 and I use it only for familial 
souvenirs and sometimes I ask me if it would be better sell it. Concerning 
the Nocti, this is a preferences decision, the perfect creations with the 
0,95 or the personal creations with the 1:0 ?.

In any case you don?t need such apertures with a MM, is a matter of 
aesthetically preferences

My only advice would be if you go for a MM, look for one with still Leica 
guarantee, as I?ve do, with Leica cameras it is better in my opinion, don?t 
take risks...

Cheers
Lluis

El 06/12/2014, a las 07:59, Susan Ryan <skalte at icloud.com> escribi?:

> After seeing Perter's Monochrom photos and Steve's Nocti 1.0 photo, I'm 
> experiencing som ennui. I'm also kind of just disgusted with myself for 
> even asking this question. Would it be a bad idea or less then equitable 
> either way, to try to swap my 1.5 year old, used only a handful of times, 
> Nocti .95 for a used Monochrom and Nocti 1.0 combo? I would really love a 
> Monochrom (I have an M9 I am not interested in selling) and I really 
> prefer the Nocti 1 to the .95 bokeh. I'm not somone who sells and re-buys 
> equipment. What I have is wonderful. Just wondering if I am missing 
> something thinking this could be a fair trade if I found an interested, 
> trustworty dealer or LUG member.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Sue
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from skalte at icloud.com (Susan Ryan) ([Leica] For trade? Or, maybe I'm just way off base.)