Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Merci Philippe, As I have commented, I had no intention to do a test, both are nice and I find interesting comparing them. Amiti?s Lluis El 07/12/2014, a las 10:34, Philippe <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> escribi?: > > The second lens is much less aggressive as rendered here. > I'll have a second look tonight on the other Mac > > Both pairs are nice Lluis, fear not the bokeh devil in me ;-) > > Amities > Philippe @Mutz > > >> >> >> On 07 Dec 2014, at 01:12, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at >> gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> In different days in the same place, aperture was 2.8 in all cases >>> (except the second picture the EIXIF indicates 2.4), with Leica MM >>> >>> Also same photographer and same film?.he?he.. >>> >>> The two first are with Summicron Collapsible >>> >>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001505LR5.jpg.html> >>> >>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001506LR5.jpg.html> >>> >>> The two second with the Summicron Rigid >>> >>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000188LR5.jpg.html> >>> >>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000189LR5.jpg.html> >>> >>> I want repeat the test, doing it the same day and same processing, but >>> in my opinion the renditions are different, the collapsible gives more >>> Contrast and the Rigid more smoothness and grey tones. >>> >>> Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated >>> >>> Saludos cordiales >>> Lluis > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information