Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Same here, but I'm puzzled as to why the image software would produce such different results. I have LR5 and Capture One 7Pro and wouldn't expect this much variation - maybe a setting off somewhere? Ken On 8/2/2014 2:07 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > On Aug 2, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote: > >> I would like know your opinions, I?m not quite happy with the B&W I?m >> getting from my scanned latest films. In my opinion the first one I?ve >> posted The highlights and shadows areas are too extremes and in the >> picture the gray scale is very poor: >> >> Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with Capture One 7Pro >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301.jpg.html> >> >> I?ve do two new versions: >> >> Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with LR5 >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301bisLR5.jpg.html> >> >> Epson V700, Epson Software, processed in LR5 >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301V700EPSoft001LR5.jpg.html> >> >> What do you think? I Think I would choose the one with Plustek, Vuescan >> and LR5 I like better the contrast and on the other hand with Vuescan I >> can produce DNG files and this is much better. > On my monitor this one displays best for my eyes > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301V700EPSoft001LR5.jpg.html> > > I prefer the greater range of mid tones > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information