Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]For me, the first one is too extreme, which is what I said when you first showed it. I think the last one is the best, it preserves the tones and you can punch up the contrast a bit and still have some midtones left. It looks like the negative is overdeveloped if you are having so much difficulty scanning it. Un abrazo, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator YNWA On 02 Aug 2014, at 20:47, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like know your opinions, I?m not quite happy with the B&W I?m > getting from my scanned latest films. In my opinion the first one I?ve > posted The highlights and shadows areas are too extremes and in the > picture the gray scale is very poor: > > Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with Capture One 7Pro > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301.jpg.html> > > I?ve do two new versions: > > Plustek Scanner, Vuescan and processed with LR5 > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301bisLR5.jpg.html> > > Epson V700, Epson Software, processed in LR5 > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/La+Barceloneta/2014070301V700EPSoft001LR5.jpg.html> > > What do you think? I Think I would choose the one with Plustek, Vuescan > and LR5 I like better the contrast and on the other hand with Vuescan I > can produce DNG files and this is much better. > > Thank you very much! > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >