Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Comparison between ooc jpg & post processing
From: tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley)
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:06:01 -0400
References: <54150727.8070609@jayburleson.com>
 
Quite a difference!!  Beautiful work.

Tina

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com>
wrote:

> The Klais Organ shot
>
> jpg out of camera:
> http://tinyurl.com/n5pvq57
> (Photoshop resample down to 1350 px long edge & 180 dpi, maximum quality
> (12) jpg; no other post processing or cropping applied.)
>
> Processed image:
> http://tinyurl.com/o98as9z
>
> There is a reason why the ooc jpg looks like it does. Details in my next
> post.
>
> Jay
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
In reply to: Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] Comparison between ooc jpg & post processing)