Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lluis, One of the things about the MM is that if one has a properly exposed image, then it exhibits the long, smooth tonal scale and other characteristics of film, minus the grain. Just what your comparison shows, and you don't have to get your hands wet with chemicals! Jay On 10/5/2014 6:25 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote: > I have scanned two film backlights from the year 2007 with Kodak Plus X, > Leica MP, lens ignored. Plustek scanner and Vuescan : > > Carrer del Correu Vell > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031228LR5BN.jpg.html> > > The Light Way > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031216LR5BN.jpg.html> > > Please compare to the Leica Monochrom with Tri Elmar recently posted: > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141003_L1001068__MMLR5BN.jpg.html> > > All these pictures have a slightly touch of Silver Efex Pro, same toning > applied to all. > > In my opinion I can?t say any better quality on film vs MM, except the > grain of course, I?ve don?t put it on the MM version, I consider it is > artificial. What do you think? > > Thanks for looking, your c&c are greatly appreciated > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis