Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They ought to use the suffix "K" 6K for 6,000 euros, 8K for 8,000 and so on;-) Douglas On 10.10.2014 02:47, Richard Man wrote: > When they started to call the products Leica M, and Leica S, Leica X etc. > some said, that will cause confusion! and Leicapjiles raised up and said, > no it won't, it's Leica M Type 240, and S 006 etc. Now we see the effect, > we have > Leica M, M-P which is different from MP, M Edition 60, M this and that. > > So much clearer now!! Ha! > > Give me the old M2, M3, M4, M4P etc. naming any day! > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:42 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > >> 10770/10772 black and the others chrome. So just look at what is new with >> the M-P (240) over the M(240) and see if you want to pay for that, then >> choose your finish ;-) >> >> Scratch resistant display-cover made of sapphire glass >> Long-lasting readiness to capture due to a large double sized image >> buffer of 2GB (possible to shoot up to 24 images in full continuous speed >> of 3 fps) >> Pure look without the Leica Logo and "M" lettering on the front side >> Manual viewfinder frame selection with the traditional 'frame >> selector' >> >> john >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Any place I can go to view the differences between 10770 , 1, 2, 3 etc...? >> The Leica website is less than helpful. >> >> >> -Lew Schwartz >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >