Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is all nice to talk about. But this is about as useless as talking about the technical trivia we get all wrapped up about. A BIG WASTE OF TIME. Tina's photography is as good as it gets, and we should not be worrying about how well/ or how many frames she shoots. this all started when someone said it looked a bit unsharp. I took a second look, and it certainly looked sharp to me. In reality with was the way it was posted by her service, and not the actual photo. Why we are still whineing about this is a mystery to me, when we should enjoying her work and going out and shooting making images. GET A GRIP PEOPLE! Gene Dam, now I'm starting to sound like Ted!! Better get some Meds... ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:37:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [Leica] Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part I used to carry around a gray card (WhiBal) to establish white balance, but now I just adjust by eye in LR. This got me to thinking that I should experiment some more with the gray card, as in I may or may not remember that a picture was taken at dawn. Ken On 3/20/2015 8:09 AM, Tina Manley wrote: > But now it doesn't look like dawn which was the whole point to me. > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information