Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2017/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] noct .95 ?
From: john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:58:52 +0000
References: <268387B0-20F8-4C31-87B5-A6FC5D279531@mac.com> <CAAsXt4N9BphLjWD7uHt8knUkxNaB+JzNQKZmsbVQaUWFue_MkQ@mail.gmail.com> <MMXP123MB140825DBCD64CC56FA7781FDF9A10@MMXP123MB1408.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0076F376-3ABF-4165-8E99-7B8ED1EB90EF@cartersxrd.net>
The f1.0 can produce images much more to my liking, the f0.95 is technically
much better but not as interesting IMO... Much more contrast in the f0.95,
notably sharper but it is not as unpredictable ;-) For those that find the
f1.0 large and heavy, do not even think about the f0.95!
john
-----Original Message-----
curious about why your preference for the 1 over the .95
ric
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
> To be honest, I use my f1.0 far more than the f0.95.... but neither are
> for sale ;-)
>
> john
>
Replies:
Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
In reply to:
Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)