Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree. It is not only an excellent camera, but one with such historic significance in terms of its photojournalistic legacy, that it probably stands above all the rest. How's that for being controversial ;-) Peter On 07/03/2024 05:16, Alan Magayne-Roshak via LUG wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 Frank Filippone <bmwred735i at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Part of being in a cult is to accept all things cult..... and for Leica, >> that means NOTHING is better than an M3.? If it does not look like an M3 >> (M5) it is no good.? If it has one dimension different than an M3 (M240) >> it is no good.? If it does not use a 24x36 sensor (M8) it is no good. > >> II just read about the newest member of the team of no good >> Leicas....M11.? Why? Because it does not have a removable base >> plate.....? Like the M3. > =================================================================== > For ME, the M3 was the best Leica ever, since I like the 50/90/135 > viewfinder, and it's the > only one that has it. (I know I'm in the tiniest minority. :^) -- Dr. Peter Dzwig