Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: Anand Mehta <amehta@mcs.net>
Subject: Re: to UV filter or not
From: Robert Silvers <rsilvers@media.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 15:11:01 -0500
Cc: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Organization: MIT Media Laboratory
References: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960208085409.12588A-100000@Mars.mcs.com>

More air to glass surfaces means lower contrast and more flare -- no
loss of resolution or sharpness though (with a good filter). Still, use
one in the mist and take it off if you want when you can.

Anand Mehta wrote:
> 
> Hi all!
> 
> I just picked up a new 90/2.8 Elmarit-M, and was suprised to find
> mention in the documentation the suggestion NOT to use a UV filter.
> As this has always been my habit in the past to protect the lens
> surface, I was wondering what comments you might have on this.  If
> there isn't that strong an optical case for it -- and I understand
> that reflections may occur, etc. -- I would prefer to use one as
> I occasionally find myself photographing in a mist, etc.
> 
> Thanks for your opinions,
> 
> -Anand
> 
> --
> Anand R. Mehta
> amehta@mcs.net

-- 

617/253-6515   http://grim.media.mit.edu

In reply to: Message from Anand Mehta <amehta@mcs.net> (to UV filter or not)