Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:32 AM 9/24/96 -0600, you wrote: >As far as an alternative to Leica, I would go with the Nikon over Canon. I really >dislike Canon from a quality standpoint. Although Canon is very up to date >with bells and whistles they are no longer durable. Yes the Nikon lenses may >be colder in color rendition, yes the Nikon lenses focus the opposite Since this is a Leica list, I'll be short. Canon is every bit as good as Nikon. My EOS1n and 70-200 2.8 L are every bit as durable as anything Nikon makes, and Nikon's AF lenses are not what "they used to be." But why live with alternatives, unless there is a compelling reason to? Mine was 1/250 flash sync and speed and AF. =========== Eric Welch Grants Pass, OR Analogies in writing are like feathers on a snake.