Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: CL vs CLE features?
From: Bob Sperling <bowtie@abesr.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 20:23:04 -0400

At 11:21 PM 9/2/96 -0400, you wrote:
>At 7:39 PM 10/3/96, Bob Sperling wrote:
>
>>
>>Last point: There is no way a CL lens will PROPERLY couple to an M camera
>>RF.  I'm not at all sure about the reverse.
>>
>>Bob Sperling, J.D.
>
>
>Wow!!! What a surprise... I've been using a 28mm Rokkor on my M3's for over
>a dozen years.
>
>I suppose that I'm going to have to call up all those people that I shot
>pictures for, and refund their money.
>
>They'll be pretty pi**ed when I tell them that they were wrong... those
>pictures were actually unsharp.
>
>                                        <G>reg M.
>
>                                                      Greg Mironchuk
>                                               540 Beach St, Revere, MA 02151
>                                              617-284-5950 * 617-362-7417 page
>                                                    gregm@world.std.com
>
I stand by what I said. The focus cams are at a different pitch. The depth
of field on a 28mm lens will cover the difference.
Bowtie
>
>