Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: CL & CLE Features
From: Eric Welch <ewelch@cdsnet.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 07:49:23 -0700

At 10:40 PM 10/6/96 -0700, you wrote:

>		TTL flashes would probably work fine on the CLE, but I have not
>		had this confirmed by Minolta.

Not the new flashes. The old ones that are also dedicated to manual focus
Minolta bodies, and more positively, the ones dedicated to the R4/s,sp.

>	5) to date one of only four cameras (M5,CL,CLE,M6) which offers TTL

How about G1,G2? Oh, you're comparing M cameras. I don't like the Contax G
cameras. Just played with the G2. It's an improvement, but it's still too
much unneeded buttons and too slow to use.

>Most M lenses work fine on the CL and CLE, the main exceptions being
>	1) the earlier 21's and 28's with the large rear elements
>	2) don't collapse a lens into the CL or CLE body 
>	3) the 35/50/135's with eyes block portions of the smaller camera RF/VF

And the Noctilux, which according to Leica needs a wider rangefinder base.
No to mention it's like the tail wagging the dog size-wise.

I have a friend and classmate in Journalism school who used the CLE and
loved it. Nobody else I've ever met used one professionally, but he seemed
to think it was good for that kind of shooting. I don't doubt it.

===========
Eric Welch
Grants Pass, OR