Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric, Very good point. I saw the POP piece in question. We are spending too much time on this forum to discuss a one-page piece that was probably done on a very low budget. Best regards, Chris At 08:06 PM 10/20/96 -0700, you wrote: >At 08:41 AM 10/20/96 -0700, you wrote: > >>If true, then even the vaunted OP magazine has slipped into obsequity [sic]! >>IMHO it has over the last several years that I have been reading it. We're >>right back at square one. Read all you can get your hands on, read between >>the lines in what you read and make the best informed opinion that you can. >>*You* are your own test lab! > >If all photo magazines rejected such pressure tactics, then there's nothing >the manufacturers could do. As it is now, most rags only give us what >specific functional features cameras have, and nothing truly comparative on >lenses. But is that because people have become such slaves to infinitesimal >differences between lenses they lost sight of the real issues - lenses >designed to do a specific job, forget how it compares to a company's >cameras you don't use anyway? > >=========== >Eric Welch >Grants Pass, OR > >Ever notice how fast a Mac runs? Neither did I. > >