Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Very recently Kevin said: > >A little while ago, D. Hemingway asked for comparisons of the 90/2.8 >versus the 75/1.4. Since I don't have a 90/2.8, I didn't think to respond >initially. I do have the 5 element version of the 90/2 and have bored >the LUG with some initial impressions of the performance of these two >lenses. I've been actively shooting the two lenses recently and have >a little more info. I'll recount a little of what has already been covered >for those who missed it. > >I've been shooting my current 90/2 regularly for about eight to nine >years. Over that time, I've gotten familiar with it and like both its Kevin, Don't apologize for your "stream of consciousness", this is great info and why I so much like being on the LUG list. I'm seriously thinking of getting a 75 or 90mm lens, and this kind of information is just what the doctor ordered. Chris Morrow cmo1@music.stlawu.edu