Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/11/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Roger L. Beamon wrote: > > <snip> <snip> ,snip> <snip> <snip> > Though only Oddmund has responded so far, it perfectly > illustrates my point. Oddmund's response hasn't a shred of Leica in it. Of > course, and not surprisingly, his lengthy discourse on "why photograph" or > whatever its title was, also has no relevance to Leica. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > May I ask a favor? This involves many more than just, you, Hans. My comment > is directed to all, but your post acted as the trigger. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Yes, oh great one with all the knowledge. We know what pathos means. This > *was* the Leica Users List! (Or was it? It's been so long, that I'm having a > problem remembering.) > -- and so on > Well, here is a guy who wants to show us what to do and how to do it. Roger, your comments about me are quite cheap and Leica is more than a camera. I thought you knew that. What the hell are you doing in this "Leica Historical Society of America"? Get off the blinkers! I am a Leica, Rollei, Contax and Nikon user, but first of all I am a photographer. I have no time to run around in all the *photo* related forums on Usenet. I am subscribing to the Leica User Group and the Rollei list, and I will stay. I will continue posting messages on items which I consider "Leica relevant", just like you and the others. Oddmund