Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>At 08:31 PM 22/11/96 -0700, you wrote: >>I just got a new (used) 90/2.8-M and finished a roll of this Ektachrome >>100-SW through it... the skin tones are unbelievable. >> >> >>ben > >Maybe it was the lens? > >Dan C. > With as much cash as I've pored into my bag as of late I HOPE the glass had something to do with it, however I started the roll with my 35/2 Summicron-M and have seen plenty of chrome out of that lens. Not the same results. I looked at the box and the SW designation stands for "Saturated Warm". Evidently it's in the emulsion. ben