Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Wolfgang Sachse wrote: > > Hi Group - > > I want to buy a lens whose field of view is between my > 360-deg panorama and my 84-deg, 24mm Nikkor. I am looking at > either the 21mm (Super Angulon or Elmarit) for my M6 or the > 20mm/f2.8D for my Nikon. I'm prompted to post this here > because of the number of persons who have experience with a > super-wide lens on their M-cameras. (snip) I have both the Super Angulon f/3.4 and the Nikkor 20 f/2.8 manual focus. Both are excellent lenses. Sounds like you have the pluses and minuses already figured out. It depends on how you work and what you plan to do with them. The Super Angulon won't allow metering on the M6, but that's not a problem if you keep it on a second body. I keep mine on an M2. Depth of field is so great you can usually just set it for hyperfocal distance and not worry about it. In low light, the Leica focusing system is better than an SLR for me. The SA will be a little more prone to flare than the Nikon when there's bright light source in the field of view or near it. Bottom line for me is the SA for action. It's fine for landscapes too, though the SLR permits more precise framing, obviously. As for a polarizing filter, you have to be careful not to get vignetting with the SLR 20 too. The SA has a bit of natural vignetting at wide aperatures that usually gives a pleasing effect of darkening sky edges. I never find a need to use a polarizer with it. Hope this helps. Bill Welch