Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:09 PM 31-03-97 EST, Ted wrote: >Hi Alastair, > ><<<I'm only sorry the shots are not as well reproduced as I would like. I'll >probably have to get into Kodak Photo CD more often as my Nikon Coolscan and I >are not yet "in-tune".>>>>> > >Hi Alastair, > >One of the things I became acutely aware of when my book page was produced, the >images aren't quite as good as they are in real life. And the lad producing the >site is a real whiz bang at this kind of stuff and tweaked the highest quality >he could from the scanned images. > >When we looked at the images on a couple of different computers at differnt >locations around the city, then it got real scary, as all computers may compute >but they don't all reproduce the images identically in tones etc. Why? I don't >have a clue! :) That's what I've discovered about my own web page. I spent hours trying to get each of my scanned images to look their best, only to discover that on someone elses computer, they may look terrible. I don't think that there's much that you can do about it. Dan C.