Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Multiple bodies
From: "Lucien_vD@compuserve.com" <Lucien_vD@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 08:45:31 -0400

Adi wrote:

<I do realise the many benefits of multiple bodies. However, my question
<arose from the school of thought, that said simplification and less
<superflous excess will enable us photogs to get to the heart and soul of=

the
<subject. Flowery as this may be, in essence you approach your subject, o=
r
<the person as another human being who just happens to have a camera in
hand.
<This approach is less intrusive than have multiple cameras dangling all
over
<or having to carry a huge, oversized camera bag around. The very design =
of
<the M camera supports this kind of non excess, which is what, as a long
ago
<post has written said that NG's David Alan Harvey shoots whole essays wi=
th
<one Leica M and one lens. May I add also, to this simplifying, the use o=
f
<one type of film only.

When I'm travelling for vacation, whit a bag full of : 1 reflex + 3 lense=
s
+ extender
+ 1 Leica M + 2 lenses + 1 flash + a small tripod + a ball & socket head =

+ filters + films + binoculars + etc.. I always swear every day that it i=
s
the last time
and that the next time I will only take 1 camera and 1 lens because I'm
tired , It's hot
and I feel stupid and anyhow I always use the same lens and =

I don't dare to leave something in my room etc...

And I always forget my promise and the next time I start to pack : 1 refl=
ex
 + 3 lenses + extender + 1 Leica M + 2 lenses + 1 flash + a small tripod =

+ a ball & socket head + filters + films + binoculars + etc.. =

because you never know...

May the spirit of Cartier Bresson be with me !!


Lucien
Belgium