Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
From: Postmaster@gatekeeper2.un.org (ccMail SMTPLINK)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 97 03:07:18 EST

User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined

 Original text follows 
 ----------------------------------------------
Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01)
	; Thu, 12 Jun 97 03:07:05 EST
Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA285258421; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 02:53:41 -0400
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1)
	id xma028323; Thu, 12 Jun 97 02:52:26 -0400
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA06415; Wed, 11 Jun 97 23:15:54 -0700
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA06409; Wed, 11 Jun 97 23:15:50 -0700
Received: from dennis (ana1056.deltanet.com [199.171.191.56])
	by mail2.deltanet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA22935
	for <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 23:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <339F95A0.6A60@deltanet.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 23:22:24 -0700
From: Dennis Painter <dwp@deltanet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Noncoated filter
References: <199706120543.WAA29261@axionet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us

Jacques Bilinski wrote:
> 
> > >uncoated. Is it less important for a filter to
> > >be coated than for a lens?
> >
> > Take it back. It will be the first surface to greet the incoming light
> > rays. If it's uncoated, a lot of scattering, reflecting, and other ugly
> > phenomenon will take place.
> >
> It seems to me that any light reflected from the first surface of the
> filter will simply be reflected back to the subject and therefore not
> degrade the picture. I can understand why the surface of the filter closest
> to the lens benefits from coating. Am I missing something?


I would expect it to lower contrast.

Dennis

- -- 
Experience is a tough teacher. It gives the test before the lesson.
- -unknown